- Liberty Surveys
- Posts
- Goldco: Mar Billionaires/Assessing US Financial Support to Ukraine
Goldco: Mar Billionaires/Assessing US Financial Support to Ukraine
CAN'T-MISS:
Billionaires going back to the gold standard?
Why are billionaires like Ray Dalio and Jacob Rothschild turning to gold? In a world of economic uncertainty, gold remains a reliable safeguard for your savings.
"Gold and silver transcends national
borders, politics, religions, and race.
A person may not like someone else's religion, but he'll accept his gold."
Discover why gold could be the smartest addition to your portfolio. Secure your financial future against inflation and market crashes with our FREE 2024 Gold Kit.
Eligible citizens with $50,000+ in retirement savings can also receive up to $10,000 in free silver.
Sponsored
Recent Poll:
Should the US Keep Sending Money to Ukraine?
Total Votes: 1,167
More Poll Results:
|
Here’s The Scoop
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, along with his Democrat and Republican cohorts, are hell-bent on sending billions to Ukraine while our southern border remains in chaos. But, as Sen. J.D. Vance discovered, there’s an even more sinister aspect to the $95 billion aid bill.
Vance warned that buried in the bill’s text is an “impeachment time bomb” for the next Trump presidency if he tries to stop funding the war in Ukraine. This dangerous and undemocratic clause seeks to handcuff any future president, ensuring Ukraine funding continues well into the future.
In an interview with Tucker Carlson, Vance explained that this clause would make it impossible for the next president to conduct diplomacy on his terms, leading to endless war all over the world.
Conservative host Dana Loesch questioned Sen. Rand Paul about this impeachment clause, to which Paul jokingly replied that they’re already covering their bases in case Trump is elected again.
Even Elon Musk called it “insane.” It seems the real threats to democracy are lurking within the world’s most deliberative body, as Congress attempts to wrest the power of diplomacy from whoever might win the 2024 presidential election. This doesn’t sound very democratic, does it?