Yesterday’s Poll:

Should All "Major" Presidential Candidates Receive Secret Service Protection?

Here’s The Scoop

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a presidential hopeful for 2024, has voiced his concern after being denied Secret Service protection by President Joe Biden’s administration, marking the third refusal despite his claim of being a “major candidate.”

In a statement on X, Kennedy criticized the decision as an example of “weaponization of government against Biden’s political opponents,” highlighting that his polling at 22% and 40% among young voters seemingly qualifies him for such protection based on the law for “major candidates.”

This issue isn’t just about one candidate’s personal security but touches upon the broader theme of fairness and safety in the presidential election process. Since the tragic assassination of his father, Senator Robert F. Kennedy, in 1968, “major candidates” and their spouses have been eligible for Secret Service protection.

Yet, what constitutes a “major” candidate remains at the discretion of the Homeland Security Secretary, a policy that some argue may be subject to political bias or interpretation.

With the 2024 presidential race heating up, the question of equitable treatment and safety for all presidential candidates is more relevant than ever. So, we ask you, our readers: Should all “major” presidential candidates receive Secret Service protection to ensure a safe, fair, and secure campaign environment? Is this a necessary precaution in today’s politically charged and often volatile climate, or should the current discretionary approach continue?

Other Poll Results:

Would You Pay $16 for McDonald's?

Should There Be Harsher Penalties for Swatting?

Do You Support Impeachment Proceedings Against President Joe Biden?

Should Schools Switch to a 4-Day Week?

Should John Fetterman Resign From Congress?