- Liberty Surveys
- Posts
- Should Police Be Allowed to Arrest Illegal Immigrants?
Should Police Be Allowed to Arrest Illegal Immigrants?
Should Police Be Allowed to Arrest Illegal Immigrants?
Here’s the Scoop
The State of Texas is at the heart of a contentious legal battle as civil rights groups, including the ACLU, challenge the constitutionality of Senate Bill 4 (SB4), a new law empowering police to arrest migrants suspected of illegal entry into the United States.
The ACLU of Texas has branded SB4 as the nation’s “most extreme anti-immigration law,” raising alarms about potential racial profiling and harassment.
“SB4 lets police arrest people over ‘suspicions’ about immigration status and judges deport people without due process,” the ACLU stated in an X post, highlighting concerns over the violation of constitutional rights and the disproportionate impact on Black and Brown communities.
Republican Governor Greg Abbott, who signed SB4 in Brownsville, argues that the law is a necessary response to the federal government’s failure to adequately secure the nearly 2,000-mile southern border. Texas has taken bold steps, such as busing over 65,000 migrants to cities across America and installing razor wire along the Rio Grande, in a bid to manage the border crisis.
Fiscal Year 2023 has seen record-breaking numbers, with over 2.4 million migrant encounters, underscoring the scale of the challenge facing border states. The White House has criticized SB4, claiming it “will make communities in Texas less safe.”
As Texas prepares for SB4’s implementation in March, amidst lawsuits and national scrutiny, we ask you, our readers: Should police be allowed to arrest illegal immigrants under state laws like Texas’ SB4? Is this a pragmatic approach to border control, or does it infringe upon civil liberties and federal jurisdiction over immigration enforcement?
Your opinion is crucial in this debate over state vs. federal powers, immigration policy, and the protection of constitutional rights. Vote now and share your view on this divisive and critical issue.